‘Net Zero’ Will Require A Single World Government And A Massive Drop In Public Living Standards

To achieve the “Net Zero” goals, the general public will need to dramatically reduce their quality of life while allowing a single world government to oversee & manage the agenda...



et Zero” is a list of targets that governments must comply with, as set out by the WEF and its fellow unelected globalist organization the United Nations. The UN’s “Agenda 2030” indicates that nations must dramatically lower “carbon emission” standards by the year 2030.

By 2050, the entire world (except China) must completely eliminate all sources of “carbon emissions” in order to comply with the UN’s “Agenda 2050.”

The UN and WEF insist that the general public must give up their freedom, live in cashless societies with mandatory digital IDs, stop traveling, surrender all private property and possessions to the government, eat insect-based “foods” instead of meat, and end capitalism all so the supposedly noble globalists can allegedly “save the planet” from the so-called “climate crisis” for the “common good.”

We are repeatedly told by the UN and its allies in the corporate media that extreme weather events are being caused by “manmade climate change” that apparently started in the Industrial Revolution.

But after spending all that money and throwing all that labor into Net Zero, the weather extremes, whatever they are and whatever they are caused by, will continue.

After pumping tens of trillions of dollars in taxpayer cash into the globalist schemes, the prospect of Armageddon will remain unabated. There will be no impact on the climate for the lifetimes of those who have poured their lives and money into Net Zero.

There will be no impact on the lives of their children, their children’s children or for many generations after that. There will be no suspension of extreme weather events because extreme weather events are natural facts of life and always have been.

How many fewer extreme weather events would need to be counted for Net Zero to be deemed a success? Nobody is saying. Of all the predictions made about Net Zero that is surely a cast-iron guarantee.

Professor Michael Kelly, Emeritus Professor of Engineering at England’s Cambridge University, warns that the implications are obvious. In an article for the Telegraph, Kelly exposes “the realities of Net Zero.”

“The idea that Net Zero can be achieved on the current timelines by any means short of a command economy combined with a drastic decline in standards of living – and several unlikely technological miracles – is a blatant falsehood. We can see that the infrastructure parts of the Net Zero project which are theoretically possible would cost comfortably in excess of $35 trillion and would require a dedicated and highly skilled workforce comparable to that of the construction sector as well as enormous amounts of materials.”

The professor elaborates:

“Net Zero would also require several things which today are completely impossible: scalable non-fossil energy storage, very high temperature electrical industrial processes, serious electrical aviation, and shipping. There would also be the matter of de-carbonizing agriculture. These things, if they can even be achieved, would multiply the cost at least several times over, to more than $100 trillion. So the real cost of Net Zero, or more likely of trying and failing to achieve it, would be similar to – or even more than – total projected US government spending out to 2050. There is no likelihood of that amount of money being diverted from other purposes under anything resembling normal market economics and standards of living.”

People need to know the realities of net zero.

A World Economic Forum (WEF) member is also touting a shocking suggestion for meeting the globalist organization’s “Net Zero” targets.

English primatologist and anthropologist Jane Goodall, who the WEF lists as one of its “agenda contributors,” told her fellow globalists that they could “save the planet” from “global warming” if the Earth’s population was 90 percent smaller than it is today.

Goodall argues that all of the WEF’s “problems” would be solved if fewer humans were walking the Earth. She made the statement during a panel discussion at the organization’s annual summit in Davos, Switzerland.

The panel was discussing plans for achieving “Net Zero” to comply with the targets for “Agenda 2030” as dictated by the WEF and its fellow unelected globalist organization – the United Nations.

Goodall’s comments have gathered renewed attention after a clip of her statement at the summit was recently shared on Twitter/X in which she bemoans the size of the world’s human population, suggesting that Earth would be better with far fewer people on it.

“We cannot hide away from human population growth,” she told frustrated elites. “Because it underlies so many of the other problems,” she continued.

▶️ 16 Seconds

“All of these problems that we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of the population that it was 500 years ago.” 500 years ago, as Goodall, a renowned anthropologist, would know, the population of humans was approximately 435 million. To satisfy Goodall’s suggestion to solve globalists’ “problems,” 90% of humanity would need to go.

Of course, WEF-sponsored “fact-checkers” will scramble to tell you that directly quoting Goodall’s comments is “misinformation” and you shouldn’t believe your lying ears.

However, Goodall is not the first WEF member to promote the “advantages” of a smaller population of humans.

Another celebrated WEF member called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.” The call was made by Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.”

Meadows is an honorary member of the Club of Rome and also a member of the World Economic Forum. Despite his book being published over 50 years ago, his very anti-human ideology remains a key inspiration for the agenda of the WEF and its founder Klaus Schwab. Meadows argues that most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and enjoy a “high standard of living.”

During a 2017 interview, Meadows claimed that genocide of 86% of the world’s population is “inevitable.” However, he insists that a “benevolent” dictatorship could accomplish the mass de-population “peacefully.”

“We could have eight or nine billion, probably,” he says of the world’s growing population. “If we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and people have a low standard of living,” Meadows says as he explains how the population reduction agenda could be triggered.

“But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people. And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience.”

▶️ 10 Minutes 32 Seconds

Yuval Noah Harari, a top WEF member and senior advisor to Schwab, declared last year that “we just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in today’s world. According to Harari, most of the general public have now become “redundant” and will be of little use to the global elite in the future.

Harari, who describes himself as a historian and futurist, argues that modern technologies like artificial intelligence “make it possible to replace the people.”

In September last year, Harari gloated that “climate change” will create a “technological Noah’s Ark” on Earth. He suggested that the “technological Noah’s Ark” would only be beneficial to wealthy “elites” who can save themselves while the rest of humanity perishes.

Meanwhile, an official parliamentary inquiry found in August that Germany has funneled billions of dollars in taxpayer money to Bill Gates’s foundation to fund “population control” programs and other anti-humanity schemes.

The German government was forced to reveal the funding after being compelled to hand over records by investigating politicians from the parliamentary group DIE LINKE.

The response to the inquiry revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has received around 3.8 billion euros ($4.15 billion) in funding from the German government. The funds have been directed toward various projects and programs related to globalist initiatives.

The documents show German taxpayers have handed over billions of dollars to pay schemes including population control programs and the United Nations Agenda 2030.

The idea that Net Zero can be achieved on the current timelines by any means short of a command economy combined with a drastic decline in standards of living – and several unlikely technological miracles – is a blatant falsehood. The silence of the National Academies and the professional science and engineering bodies about these big-picture engineering realities is despicable.

Even if it was human activity that brought us to this edge of the cliff, it cannot be reversed in a few short years. Nevertheless, this agenda is being peddled by almost every world leader who claims to be pursuing Net Zero.

However, experts are now warning about the dramatic impact that pursuing this agenda will have on civilization as a whole.

Most of the progress made by the human race in the last two hundred years could be erased over the next couple of decades. ✪


NOTE: This feature module is currently under construction. More podcast/series channels links will be added in the coming days & weeks. If there’s a podcast or video link you’d like to see posted here, please email your suggestions to vip@thenewamericanist.com


▶️ 1 Hour 23 Minutes 51 Seconds ⭐️ Zippity Zap

▶️ 10 Minutes 17 Seconds ⭐️ Michael Brower

▶️ 1 Hour 8 Minutes 18 seconds

▶️ 10 Minutes 21 Seconds

▶️ 19 Minutes 43 Seconds ⭐️ Zippity Zap

▶️ 14 Minutes 1 Second