



âȘ A top central banker has warned of the damage the rush to âNet-Zeroâ risks doing to Europeâs economy, and illustrates the point by noting erasing Europeâs built heritage would be necessary to meet extreme green demands…
â¶ïž READ THE FULL STORY HERE

filler
mong comments by Paolo Angelini, deputy governor at the Bank of Italy about European Net Zero targets which, in his opinion, risk doing more harm than good, the central banker articulated what level of change would actually be needed from Europeans to meet those demands.
While saying pushing Europe to net zero risks destabilizing the continentâs economy and undermining Europeâs ability to lead on green issues globally, the top economist made his point by revealing heâd asked his team at the Bank of Italy what would be necessary just to make the single institution that he leads compliant.
Angelini revealed the shocking response, remarking in an interview with Politico: âThey told me: âIf you allow us to tear down all our historical buildings and build energy efficient ones, then we can do itâ.â
The Bank of Italy wouldnât be committing itself to net zero any time soon, said Angelini. This was not because he didnât believe in the cause, but simply because with the technology presently available, he didnât think it was physically possible. He said: âFor the time being I am refraining from raising my hand and saying at the Bank of Italy weâre going to net zero, because I donât have the technology, the ability to be certain about the pledge.â
Reflecting on the central bankerâs remarks â which may possibly have been tongue-in-cheek â Politico itself mused: âitâs a potent symbol of the trade-offs that the green transition demands: how much of Europeâs present â and past â is it willing to risk to secure its future?â
The Bank of Italy itself is headquartered in the Palazzo Koch in Italy, an impressively grand 19th-century palace named for its architect which features a money museum and significant interiors and staterooms.
While study after study shows the general public far prefers traditional architecture, the matter does fall on partisan lines to some degree. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an order requiring a classical architectural style (Roman or Greek revival) for Federal buildings: President Biden revoked it. In the United Kingdom, an advisor to hard-left London mayor Sadiq Khan said traditional architecture is âoffensiveâ because it, in her view, âharks back to oppression.”
The French government wanted a modernist rebuild of Notre Dame Cathedral after the devastating fire in 2019, and fought a sustained battle against traditionalists in parliament and the public to get their vision. In the end, the traditionalists won a full historic rebuild.
While net-zero extremists could demolish historic buildings with promises of more environmentally friendly modern replacements, it isnât as if architects today have the answers. As previously reported, recent modern grand projects to create homes for large governmental organisations have run considerably over budget and over time compared to their traditional architecture alternatives.
In One particularly egregious case, the Scottish Parliament cost four times its budget and has needed remedial work on its roof since, as the aggressively modernist design failed to meet the most basic and ancient requirement for a building: keeping the rain out.âȘ






















â¶ïž CLICK HERE TO VIEW
â¶ïž 2 Minutes 27 Seconds
â¶ïž Starts @ 26 Minutes 53 Seconds
â¶ïž 1 Hour 51 Minutes 58 Seconds âïž LeeS
â¶ïž 15 Minutes 51 Seconds
â¶ïž 15 Minutes 33 Seconds
