⊠Next Thread Posts @ 20:00 PST ?

â Fighting for an America where individuals aren’t terrified to express their opinions
GSâď¸John Chisum
âFear Societyâ is Natan Sharanskyâs term for a socio-political order that flunks the âtown squareâ test: People are too frightened to speak their mind in public spaces because they fear retribution. A victim of Soviet tyranny before emigrating to Israel, for Sharansky the consequences of free expression could be arrest, imprisonment, torture, and death. For us, the regime of political correctness, âcancel culture,â âmicroaggressions,â and âwokeâ commissars reinforces a similar repression, a âsofterâ one, as Tocqueville called it, but effective nonetheless in silencing dissent and promoting an illiberal progressive ideology.
Sharansky goes on to describe the consequences of living in a fear society, which typically comprises three groups: âtrue believers,â those who sincerely believe in the regimeâs ideology; âdissidents,â those who oppose the regime and speak out against it; and âdoublethinkers,â the majority who oppose the regime yet do not publicly express their opposition, particularly to outsiders.
Donald Trumpâs political success has emboldened the conservative and Republican âdoublethinkersâ to express their opinions in the âtown squareâ and challenge the domination that for several decades the progressives have enjoyed over political speech.
In Europe, hate speech laws and the absence of the legally recognized natural right to free speech that we enjoy allow the state to legally sanction or punish speech the EU doesnât like. In contrast, here in the U.S. indirect methods of enforcement are more typically used. One method is to discredit and ostracize any alternative to progressive doctrine: âThe most successful tyranny,â Harold Bloom wrote, âis not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable.â
That is the point of political correctness: to demonize alternatives to the dominant ideology by attributing them to mental disorders like racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, xenophobia, and âwhite privilege.â Violence will sometimes be used, as in the mobs shouting down conservative speakers, or the Antifa goons physically attacking opponents. But more effective is the self-censorship of the âdoublethinkersâ who know that political correctness is illiberal and compromises political freedom, but will not publicly challenge its doctrines. Over time, the assumptions and vocabulary of political correctness become reflexive positions people express in public spaces.
We have seen this process at work in establishment Republicans who accept the Leftâs degradation of language. âRacismâ in particular has been a powerful verbal weapon for bludgeoning opponents into conformity. These âdoublethinkingâ Republicans seldom contest the Leftâs Orwellian distortion of the word âracism,â whose only legitimate meaning is the belief that all members of one group are by nature inferior to all members of another. Instead, these so-called conservatives accept the ideologically loaded meaning that âracismâ denotes any speech that disagrees with or challenges dubious progressive shibboleths like âwhite privilege,â endemic âwhite racism,â âimplicit bias,â âdisparate impact,â or even the mentioning of established facts, such as police killings of unarmed black males are rare, while 90% of black deaths come at the hands of other blacks. Indeed, mere criticism, no matter how justified or unrelated to race, of a âperson of colorâ is prima facie racism.
Moreover, this progressive revision of language has now become joined to notions of decorum, civility, âprinciples,â or manners, which always have been instruments of social-class identification and elite gate-keeping. Now ideologically skewed terms like âracismâ or âhomophobiaâ define public decorum. The ârightâ peopleââthose with university credentials and a self-proclaimed superiority of intellect, taste, and knowledgeââdistance themselves from the semiliterate rubes and âbitter clingers to guns and religionâ by conspicuously condemning and decrying âracismâ and other thought-crimes. Self-censorship has evolved into good manners that sacrifice truth and coherence of argument to oneâs class identity.
Donald Trump has challenged this whole regime of doublethink, and encouraged the âdissidentsâ who for decades now have been frustrated by alleged conservatives ceding so much moral and linguistic high-ground to the illiberal Left. Trumpâs blunt, sometimes crude manner and style relentlessly attack the tyrannical regime of political correctness, and its abettors among NeverTrump Republicans who mask their irrational bitterness and wounded professional and personal self-love in cries of violated âprinciplesâ and âdecorum.â Most important, he has exposed the hypocrisy of both cohorts: The affluent progressives who compensate for their privilege by endorsing the illiberal tenets of identity politics and political correctness, and the NeverTrump careerists and elitists angry that their political country club has been crashed by a brash vulgarian.
The sorry spectacle of Mitt Romneyâs moral preening last week during the Senate impeachment vote is a good example. Romney voted to convict Trump of the fantasy crime of âabuse of power,â the first time in history that a Senator has voted against a president from his own party without any proven âhigh crimes or misdemeanors.â Romneyâs rationale was typical NeverTrump bluster about âprincipleâ seasoned with Pharasaism: âI swore an oath before God to exercise impartial justice,â he said. âI am profoundly religious. My faith is at the heart of who I am.â The president was âgrievously wrongâ and âguilty of an appalling abuse of public trust.â
This is the same Mitt Romney who solicited and received Trumpâs endorsement when he ran for president in 2012, a time when Trumpâs personality and demeanor were well known. Yet when Trump began his presidential run in 2015, Romney called him âchildishâ and later a âphony, a fraudâ who is âplaying members of the American public for suckers.â He then claimed that if âTrump had said what he said about âthe KKK, Muslims, Mexicans, disabled,â he would âNOT have accepted his endorsementâ in 2012. Thereâs the typical Republican NeverTrumperâs validation of the Leftâs question-begging smears about Trumpâs âracismâ and affinity for âwhite supremacistsâ and other forms of intolerance. Yet despite all this sanctimonious dudgeon, Romney trekked to the White House in a failed, and humiliating, bid to become Trumpâs Secretary of State.
After that, in 2017 Romney joined the duplicitous chorus of Dems and Donk NeverTrumpers who claimed that Trump said that the marginal white supremacists protesting at Charlottesville were âfine people,â a canard exploded numerous times. Yet he continued to speak with the president occasionally, and in 2018 secured Trumpâs endorsement for his Senate bid. Despite Trumpâs kind remarks at that time, Romney continued to snipe at Trump, once again parroting the bipartisan NeverTrumpers in saying of Trumpâs comments about Russian interference in the electionââwhich we now know has been overblown by the same intelligence agencies that would go on to undermine Trumpâs administrationâââPresident Trumpâs decision to side with Putin over American intelligence agencies is disgraceful and detrimental to our democratic principles.â
No, Senator, whatâs âdisgracefulâ is that our intelligence agencies did not examine the DNC server Russia allegedly hacked, but took the word of a private enterprise bought and paid for by the DNC. We still donât know the truth about the origins of the hack, which hasnât kept Trumpâs enemies from continually asserting a suspicion as a fact.
You can read here more of Romneyâs attacks on Trump, such as his response to the Mueller report that he was âsickened at the extent and pervasiveness of dishonesty and misdirectionâ of Trump and his administration. How about the âdishonesty and misdirectionâ of the intelligence agency functionaries who violated the Constitution by weaponizing the surveillance and enforcement powers of the FBI, DOJ, CIA, and State Department in order to advance their political and professional interests?
Given Romneyâs self-interested behavior, can we blame people for seeing all this principled dudgeon as instead sour grapes over a political tyro doing what Romney, with his gilt-edged political curriculum vitae, couldnât do? And doesnât it suggest elastic principles in the service of careerism that Romney, despite his estimation of Trump as a âthreat to democracy,â would offer himself up as a candidate for Secretary of State, and then solicit Trumpâs endorsement when he ran for the Senate? And isnât he embarrassed by the effusive encomia he has received from MSNBC, CNN, and other progressive mouthpieces? Romney should heed the wisdom of the philosopher Antisthenes: When bad men praise you, you should be horribly afraid that youâve done something wrong.
We donât know if Romney, or any NeverTrumper, is a âdoublethinker,â or if he is conscious of his hypocrisy and careerism. Many NeverTrumpers might be like Holly Golightly, a âreal phonyâ who âreally believes all the crapâ they claim to believe. The main point is that by endorsing the Orwellian lexicon of politically correct abuse, and taking their stand on âprinciplesâ they are willing to violate or selectively apply, they give aid and comfort to the progressive âtrue believersâ whose long hegemony over our political life and culture that Trump has challenged.
By emboldening the âdissidentsâ against the illiberal regime, Trump has struck a blow against an aggressive progressivism that seeks to dismantle our Constitutional safeguards against tyranny, and has begun to dismantle their âfear society,â and return us to what America was created to be: a free society where anyone can âbawl out his freedom,â as Aeschylus put it, in the town square.
SOURCE:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/02/trump-battles-progressive-fear-society-bruce-thornton/