▶️ VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: TRUMP ASTRIDE AT SEVEN MONTHS
⭐️ HelloKitty’sGotAHairTrigger
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: TRUMP ASTRIDE AT SEVEN MONTHS
ddd
even months in, Trump has curbed illegal immigration, steadied the economy, and scored foreign policy wins—while the Democrats flounder without any counter agenda. Trump’s greatest achievement within six months was simply ending illegal immigration as we had once known it—without “comprehensive immigration reform” or any other rhetorical trickery.
It remains difficult to find, much less deport, the 10 to 12 million illegal aliens who entered in the last four years. Those who helped break the law, by design or indifference, now believe it was moral to destroy federal immigration law but immoral to uphold it.
And it is still unclear whether Joe Biden’s handlers deliberately sabotaged their own border for political and demographic purposes out of sheer orneriness or utter incompetence.
Many of the Left’s cherished totems—massive Green New Deal subsidies, the diversity/equity/inclusion industry, biological males competing in women’s sports, and the USAID revolving door—are either comatose or in their death throes.
The historic drop-off in military recruitment reversed shortly after Trump took office. Republican voter registration is up, and Democrat registration is down.
Abroad, Trump finds remarkable successes. For now, there are pauses in the fighting between India and Pakistan, Egypt and Somalia, Cambodia and Thailand, Rwanda and Congo, Serbia and Kosovo, and Armenia and Azerbaijan. Much credit is due to Trump for brokering ceasefires.
Iran will not get a bomb in the next four years—as seemed likely when Biden left office. The Middle East’s current most grotesque terrorist cadres and states—Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis—are far weaker than they were when Trump entered office in January.
There is at least some engagement in envisioning the outlines of a ceasefire in Trump’s inherited Ukraine War.
The rub is finding the degree of ordnance necessary to convince Putin that increasing Russia’s casualties to more than one million will endanger his own dictatorship sooner than destroy Ukraine.
Breaking up the new three-billion-person China/India/Russia nexus hinges on ending the war.
The economy is still strong. Gas prices are at historic lows. Increases in all types of energy production proceed full bore.
Current GDP, inflation, unemployment, and the stock market—all at one time or another said to be in a crisis state—remain strong. Talk of an impending recession or hyperinflation is mostly muted.
No one quite knows either the full effects of Trump’s tariffs—especially given the injunctions issued by left-wing district justices—or of the promised over $10 trillion in foreign investments.
Much of Trump’s agenda will hinge on whether interest rates are lowered, Republicans survive the midterms, and the degree to which unelected left-wing lower-court justices can be stopped from hijacking the Constitution and de facto running the country.
As for the Democrat opposition, there is no counter agenda, no shadow government responsible leadership, and no willingness to craft bipartisan legislation.
Instead, the left’s strategy is that of the kamikaze: to destroy Trump at the cost of destroying the Democrat Party.
Otherwise, Democrats seek to prove so obnoxious in demonizing Trump that they create such mass hysteria that the weary electorate figuratively lies down, closes its eyes, covers its ears, and screams nonstop, “Make them all go away!”
Former foul-mouthed vice presidential candidate Tim Walz is now reduced to a ghoulish status. He recently boasted to an audience that rumors of Trump’s death—who survived two assassination attempts last summer—will thankfully one day prove true.
The top of the failed ticket, Kamala Harris, wanders aimlessly without an office, constituency, audience, or ideas.
To remain viable, she knows she must continue touring and speaking. However Harris accepts that the more anyone hears her word salads, the more they will remember her 2024 train wreck.
Thee head of the Democrat Party, Ken Martin, now screams that Trump is a fascist. But by what standards does he judge? Did Trump try to take his rivals off state ballots?
Does he advocate for destroying the filibuster, the Electoral College, and the 156-year-old nine-justice Supreme Court, or packing the Senate by admitting two new states?
Are local, state, and federal prosecutors—à la Bragg, James, Smith, and Willis—coordinating with the White House and DOJ to indict Trump’s current chief adversaries, such as Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, or Josh Shapiro?
Did Trumpers hire a foreign spy to concoct a fake hit dossier on Democrat grandees? Are his subordinates now spreading it to the media?
Are 51 conservative former CIA contractors and retired spooks swearing that Newsom or Harris is working with the Russians, Chinese, or any of our enemies?
The greatest Democrat fear? That it has so institutionalized excessive executive orders, ad hominem lawfare, lower-court usurpation, state nullification of federal law, and federal intervention in higher education, the energy industry, and the nation’s open spaces that their own legacies empowered Trump and now will boomerang upon themselves—as the public applauds the karma. ✪
▶️ JB SHURK: EUROPE IS A POWDERKEG
⭐️ HelloKitty’sGotAHairTrigger
JB SHURK: EUROPE IS A POWDERKEG
gggg
mericans who don’t spend time in Europe might not fully appreciate what a powder keg the Old World has become. However bad social relations in the United States now are, they are at least an order of magnitude worse on the other side of the Atlantic. European self-hatred is dissolving traditional cultural bonds. Mass immigration is compounding age-old rivalries. Europe is one spark away from exploding.
Europe is a perennial battlefield. Many of our ancestors, after all, left the old country to escape religious, economic, and cultural conflicts that had endured for centuries. Those historic grievances — always simmering in times of peace before boiling over into outright violence — are passed from one generation to the next. Modern European nations are the product of two thousand years of shifting borders and alliances; and native Europeans trace their family lineages back to regional tribes whose ancient territories do not fit neatly within the politically drawn maps of today.
If you think geographical accents in America make it tricky for a Mississippian or Minnesotan to communicate effectively with an English-speaker from the Bronx, consider that Europe is home to nearly three hundred native tongues. Switzerland has four national languages — including Romansch, which derives from the spoken Latin of the Roman Empire. The cornucopia of indigenous languages, dialects, vocabularies, and accents makes it possible for local residents of small towns to recognize “outsiders” immediately. Even more impressively, they can usually tell — just by listening — which towns a stranger’s grandparents once called home.
Two world wars — both ignited in Europe and responsible for immense European destruction — propelled a mid-twentieth-century political movement calling for the eradication of national borders. The European intelligentsia who became the founding members of the continent’s fledgling transnational bureaucracy blamed national pride for Europe’s carnage and effectively turned “nationalism” into a dirty word.
Oddly, this was also a time when crumbling empires, such as France and the United Kingdom, were at least tepidly supporting the national independence of former colonies. Likewise, it was the beginning of a half-century U.S.-led campaign to encourage national revolutions in European countries stuck behind the Soviet Union’s Iron Curtain. So Western power brokers framed nationalism as a kind of intolerable ethos on par with Mussolini’s fascism and Hitler’s national socialism while encouraging former nations or proto-nations in Central Europe, Africa, and Asia to break away from the respective empires that controlled them. While Western leaders pushed for the integration of distinct European nations into a single “Union,” they also promoted national independence movements under the rationale that all humans possess a natural right to self-determination.
In the eighty years since the project for European integration began in earnest, those latent contradictions have transformed Europe into a tinderbox with even greater potential energy for self-destruction than existed before WWI and II. While the bureaucratic ruling class has actively repressed the historic identities of native Europeans, it has flooded the continent with foreigners who are encouraged to retain their own cultural identities. In this way, a Hungarian or Pole or Dane who celebrates his country’s unique heritage is denounced as a “far-right nationalist,” while a Frenchman who insists that African and Middle Eastern immigrants assimilate to the European way of life is denounced as a “racist” and “bigot.”
This anti-European monstrosity was created deliberately. Simultaneous suppression of Europeans’ national identities and protections for foreign nationals create a kind of “multiculturalism dynamo” that converts Europeans into something alien. Stripped of their native religion, culture, and historic customs and forced to praise foreign religions, cultures, and customs taking hold in the West’s civilizational void, Europeans are effectively assimilated within their own lands. Europeans are taught to despise their own civilization and to bow down before those who seek to replicate a foreign civilization inside Europe. Europe’s bureaucratic ruling class uses foreigners to beat the Europeanness out of Europeans.
Perhaps because a critical mass of Europeans finally realizes what Europe’s unelected bureaucrats have done, a “Great Awakening” is spreading across the continent. After decades of submitting to cultural erasure, a patriotic fervor is taking root once again. As many now see it, if globalism’s war on nationalism means that only nations outside Europe will survive, then European peace is not worth the cost.
Many Americans will dismiss this resurgence of European nationalism as “too little, too late,” but I would strike a more optimistic chord. Sometimes we must be pushed to the edge of the cliff before we find our footing and forcefully fight back. When surrender means falling into the sea and survival requires moving in the opposite direction, the right choice is also the only one.
In the United Kingdom, a grassroots movement of ordinary Brits has initiated “Operation: Raise the Colors.” The strategy is simple: British citizens are encouraged to prominently display and wave the Cross of St. George and Union Jack flags.
What could possibly be offensive or dangerous about raising the flags of England and the United Kingdom? Nothing. Yet the globalist Establishment is losing its collective mind. Leftists insist that the flags should be replaced with something more “multicultural” and that only “far-right racists” would stoop so low as to patriotically raise the country’s flags. Open-borders politicians are calling the flag-waving “extremist, hate-filled,” and “white supremacist.” In other words, the British people have forced Britain’s “elites” to acknowledge that they have no loyalty to and only antipathy for the United Kingdom.
This rather anodyne form of political speech is proving remarkably effective at exposing globalism’s suicidal contagion. In London, it is perfectly normal to see so-called “gay pride” flags, “Palestinian” flags, Pakistani flags, Iranian flags, and the flags of almost every third-world nation now offloading its citizens onto the shores of the U.K. If a British citizen were to express outrage over the fact that a panoply of foreign flags is flown brazenly throughout the capital, constables would intimidate the outspoken “offender” into silence by threatening him with prosecution for imaginary “hate speech.” Revealingly, however, these same petty tyrants throw hissy fits when native Brits dare “raise the colors” of their own nation’s historic flags.
Similar movements are picking up steam. Ten years ago, it was more common to see such patriotic displays on the streets of Balkan nations or amid independence parades in the Basque region or other areas of Europe seeking national recognition. Today it is easy to stumble into a sea of Dutch, Danish, German, Italian, Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish, Hungarian, Polish, Czech, or Greek flags when crossing borders. Eighty years after the European Union began constructing its continental empire, the “colonies” appear eager to reclaim their right to self-determination.
I think it’s fair to say that ordinary Europeans are no longer willing to remain quiet as the bureaucratic ruling class kills what’s left of Europe and hands the carcass to foreign conquerors. As an American with absolute fidelity to the millennia-long promises of Western civilization, I find these patriotic revivals timely rebuttals to a globalist Establishment that prefers our death.
I cannot tell you how many times I have come across the words of Welsh poet Dylan Thomas translated into one of Europe’s many native languages. “Do not go gentle into that good night” and “Rage, rage against the dying of the light” show up on message boards like faint heartbeats on an EKG machine. Many in Europe don’t want to die. To live, they’ll have to fight. ✪
▶️ GOOD TIMES CAN CREATE GOOD MEN
GOOD TIMES CAN CREATE GOOD MEN
jjj
ard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. Weak men create hard times. Thus the cycle goes, or at least so it is said.
Peace and prosperity don’t inevitably breed weakness; through prudence, diligence, and wisdom, good times can endure and even lead to even much better times.
However, history is not so neat and tidy. If history really had set, knowable patterns that could not be altered, then there would be no need to discuss or think about political life. If something is inevitable, there is no need to debate about it. There are no choices to be made.
For instance, there is no point debating whether or not jumping off a tall cliff will lead to you falling to the ground. Gravity is not open to debate. It simply is. One cannot simply choose to fly around.
However, political reality is not like this. The future is always unknown. We can make real choices which either lead us towards better outcomes or worse outcomes. At the level of a political regime, if statesmen continually choose to avoid foolish wars and to punish criminals, they will bring about peace.
If a nation lives in peace and freedom, then its people will be free to seek happiness through association and exchange. They will improve in the arts and sciences in order to satisfy their needs and wants. They will trade peaceably among one another. In such circumstances, life will inexorably improve over time.
This is because all men seek good things and avoid bad things. When we truly find the good things we seek, that we call happiness. These good things range from the simple—food and drink—to the elevated—knowledge of the world around us and friendship. To see our loved ones cured of illness, our children prosperous, and our cities clean and safe—these are great pleasures indeed. A good political regime secures theses conditions for such happiness by protecting the citizenry from violent death.
When we solve the most basic problems of life; finding food, shelter, and safety, then we have extra time and resources to solve new problems or to solve the old problems more efficiently. The more human beings focus on solving a problem, the more likely they are to succeed in solving that problem. If we break big problems down into small problems and each of us adopts one of these small problems as our own to solve, then big problem after big problem can be remedied.
This is prosperity; and it is the highest form of material happiness in this life.Once this prosperity comes into being, it can only be broken by unforeseen natural disasters or by threats that the regime cannot maneuver out of diplomatically or by defeat in open combat. In other words, good times can, in fact, lead to even better times, and life really can continue improving continuously.
Diseases that were incurable yesterday have become treatable. Vistas of intellectual and spiritual life that were once closed off by brutal violence and civil war become acessable. Art that was once the province only of the super wealthy becomes accessible to the common man. Grinding poverty is replaced by ever better and more efficient work. Leisure time becomes available to all.
Peace is the source of the greatest happiness for the greatest part of mankind. And once we secure it, it is theoretically possible to continue in that state for a very long time. It is not inevitable that peace will destroy itself of its own accord.
If good times lead to weak men, then the times were not really good to begin with. If peace and prosperity lead to man’s degeneration, then peace and prosperity are evil, and we should choose endless war instead. We could choose to stay in the hard times forever.
On the other hand, if war and peace are not a matter of choice but the result of fate alone, then there is no need to discuss the conditions of peace or victory in war because there is nothing we can do to bring about either into being. We ought to abandon ourselves to chance and cease to search for the improvement of our condition, finding consolation in the muck.
In light of these alternatives, I hold that we should maintain equanimity towards the future. We cannot see the unforeseeable. We cannot foresee all threats; and we cannot prepare for all accidents. Good times do not end because they make us weak, but only because we cannot know all things. Our natures are prone to ignorance and to passions that to easily occlude the truth. This problem is simply with us in times both good and bad.
However, our task is not to transform our most basic nature because this is not really possible. Rather, our work is to do the best we can with what we have. By recognizing & acknowledging the selfishness & ignorance of our passions, we can tame & curtail our weaknesses. We can take a step back before we make a rash or foolish decision.
Through prudence, hard work and diligence, we can seek to mitigate the most visible and pressing threats. We can approach our problems logically and deal with the most urgent first. There is never any guarantee we will achieve our goals or that peace & prosperity will endure; but we may well be able to stave off far worse disasters in our lifetimes. Our children and children’s children may well do the same if we leave to them an inheritance of accumulated wisdom they can use for themselves.
We should turn aside from both delusional optimism and pessimism alike. We must recognize that while peace can endure and build upon itself, human beings are also prone to stupidity and wickedness. It is simply a fact that some human beings find their highest happiness in murder, rape, torture, and theft. Their greatest pleasure is dealing out death and destruction. They can never be happy living within a peaceful civilization. These people cannot be cured; they can only be stopped. And unfortunately, this usually requires the use of violence.
Moreover, there are powerful tendencies within the human heart to deny obvious logic and reason. Our knowledge of the world around us is only partial, and we have powerful passions that distract us from calm reflection.
It is easy, even for humane and otherwise civilized men, to be led into delusion. They may come to believe their highest happiness should be found in war and death. The only solution to this problem is a diligent return to clear, intelligent and logical thinking. We must always look and reflect back again to our first aims. What is it that we desire? What is it which is truly good & best for us? What will it take to achieve it?
This is the work of civilized men. ✪
▶️ TIM KAINE THINKS YOU’RE A TERRORIST
TIM KAINE THINKS YOU’RE A TERRORIST
lll
enator Tim Kaine, D-Va. — who was once nearly a heartbeat away from the presidency — declared Wednesday that if you believe in the Declaration of Independence you’re a terrorist. How else should America interpret his statement?
“The notion that rights don’t come from laws and don’t come from the government, but come from the Creator — that’s what the Iranian government believes. It’s a theocratic regime that bases its rule on Sharia law and targets Sunnis, Bahá’ís, Jews, Christians and other religious minorities. And they do it because they believe that they understand what natural rights are from their Creator. So the statement that our rights do not come from our laws or our governments is extremely troubling.”
But the idea that rights come from God, the Creator, rather than the state, is neither radical nor foreign. It is the foundational principle of the Republic. The Declaration affirms this:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
The Founders recognized that all people are born with certain natural rights that are pre-political and grounded in nature and reason. These rights exist independently of government or rulers and are “endowed by their Creator.”
This conviction at the heart of our founding was inspired by theologians like Thomas Aquinas, who recognized that God created an ordered cosmos, and that we can fully apprehend the natural law embedded in His creation through a combination of reason and revelation.
“The natural law is nothing else than the rational creature’s participation of the eternal law,” Aquinas wrote.
Natural Law, therefore, binds all humans. And Natural Law is a distinctly Christian holding. As John Adams wrote:
“Our great Advantage of the Christian religion is that it brings the great Principle of the Law of Nature and Nations … to the Knowledge, Belief and Veneration of the whole People.”
The claim that “all men are created equal” is a specifically Christian claim because “God created all men equal, they all bear the imago Dei, the image of God.” (Genesis 1:27]
This point has been reinforced numerous times throughout history by others.
U. S. Supreme Court Justice James Wilson wrote in his 1790-1791 Lectures on Law;
“Human law must rest its authority, ultimately, upon the authority of that law which is divine [God’s moral law in the Bible] … Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other. The divine law, as discovered by reason and moral sense, forms an essential part of both.”
President and Secretary of State John Quincy Adams (who was the son of John Adams), would later proclaim in his July 4, 1821 address:
“From the day of the Declaration, the people of the North American union and of its constituent states were associated bodies of civilized men and Christians, in a state of nature, but not of anarchy. They were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of the Gospel, which they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of their conduct.”
It is this very concept of natural rights; rights which come from God which led the Founders to declare independence and establish this Republic. In doing so, they were making a break from the divine right theory of kingship, which had held sway in England since the time of Henry VIII and the Reformation, in order to return to natural law as the basis for political authority. Divine right theory held that the right of the monarch to rule is derived directly from divine authority, hence the king is not subject to the will of the people, the nobility, the church, or any other estate of the realm. In addition, divine right theory asserts that any rights of the people come from the monarch, and can therefore be given or taken away by the monarch. The Founders recognized this theory violated Natural Law and they understood, monarchy; or at least any monarchy based on the divine right theory, was an illegitimate form of government.
In contrast, they believed legitimate government should protect and facilitate the enjoyment of natural rights of every citizen. That’s why they declared these rights as “unalienable.” They knew a legitimate government can only be formed when men recognize these natural rights, establish a social compact on that basis, and create a government to protect those rights. When the Founders saw the English crown was trampling on their natural rights, and there was no other way to redress their grievances, they declared independence from the king.
Of course, not all law comes from God and not all law is Natural Law. Some laws are indeed created by government ; laws which are “positive laws.” These laws are necessary to protect and secure everyone’s natural rights.
But Kaine’s claim that rights originating from the Creator are “troubling” is a fundamental misunderstanding of the Founders’ philosophy and the significance of the Declaration of Independence. The Founders did not see natural rights and their ties to Christianity as a threat. They correctly saw them as the very foundation of liberty. To deny this is to not only misread the Declaration and the Founders’ wisdom, but undermine the very underpinnings of our Republic. Any politician who can’t understand where our fundamental rights come from is unfit to serve in public office.✪
▶️ A NEW CANCER TREATMENT PROTOCOL: SUCCESS!
A NEW CANCER TREATMENT PROTOCOL: SUCCESS!
jjj
groundbreaking hybrid protocol using repurposed drugs and nutrients left one man cancer-free after Stage 4 prostate cancer; at a fraction of standard treatment costs.
In 2023, according to the US Centers for Disease Control, 613,349 Americans died of cancer. That number is projected to increase to over 618,000 this year. As a result, medical research has been focused on the development of cancer treatment protocols for decades for all types of cancer.
The National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) and the National Institute of Health’s ClinicalTrials.gov website list hundreds of active protocols, with 457 NCI-supported protocols noted in clinical trial databases for various cancer types and stages.
For example, there are approximately a dozen known treatment protocols for Stage 4 prostate cancer that focus on managing the disease since it is considered to be incurable. For context, the American Cancer Society’s estimates for prostate cancer in the US for 2025 are about 313,780 new cases and about 35,770 projected deaths.
Medical researchers are continually developing potentially breakthrough cancer protocols. This is the true story of one man’s experience with a new protocol that exploits repurposed drugs.
✪ THE PATIENT
Mr. Jeffrey Kramer of Shelby, Ohio, retired as a plaintiff’s civil fraud attorney in 2024 after he was diagnosed with metastasized Stage 4 prostate cancer that had spread into his hip bones, lumbar spine, and inguinal lymph nodes. His Cleveland Clinic oncologist had advised him that the cancer was incurable but probably manageable for a (short) time using testosterone suppressant drugs (leuprolide injections and apalutamide pills) until his body ceased being “hormone sensitive,” at which point he would decline from there.
The side effects of that drug combo would be substantial and potentially mortal. Most significant was that the leuprolide injection(s) would assuredly demineralize his bones at a high rate (up to 11% per year), leading to hip fracture(s) and loss of mobility.
This was Mr. Kramer’s second bout with serious cancer, as in 2010, he had undergone surgery, then three months of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for tonsil cancer that had incapacitated him for a year before he was able to resume his law practice.
Last fall, Mr. Kramer received information about a new cancer protocol that would change his life.
✪ THE PROTOCOL
A new peer-reviewed cancer protocol authored by a team of sixteen cancer doctors and medical researchers from the US and several other nations was published in the September 2024 Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, titled “Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.” Its authors were prominent in oncology, and the published protocol was heavily footnoted to 204 medical studies documenting in vivo and in vitro safe and successful use of each and every element of the protocol. The authors of many of the referenced studies are at the top of their profession, i.e., well-known, highly published doctors and medical research professionals.
Here is an excerpt from the abstract that explains the science (not for the non-technical among us!):
The cancer paradigm is generally based on the somatic mutation model, asserting that cancer is a disease of genetic origin. The mitochondrial-stem cell connection (MSCC) proposes that tumorigenesis may result from an alteration of the mitochondria, specifically a chronic oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) insufficiency in stem cells, which forms cancer stem cells (CSCs) and leads to malignancy. Reviewed evidence suggests that the MSCC could provide a comprehensive understanding of all the different stages of cancer.
From the research presented in the paper, a hybrid orthomolecular protocol was developed that relies upon six elements (or “molecules”):
[1] a therapeutic ketogenic diet high in fats and protein but low in carbs.
[2] moderate exercise (aerobic heart rate) for 45-75 minutes three times a week, such as cycling, running, swimming, etc.
[3] high-dose (non-toxic level) vitamin C by IV, PICC, or port three times a week.
[4] ivermectin daily at a proven safe dosage.
[5] fenbendazole (or mebendazole) daily at a proven safe dosage.
[6] daily vitamin/mineral supplements of safe levels of vitamin D, vitamin K2, zinc, magnesium, and potassium, with a lab test every two weeks to monitor liver and kidney function and potassium and vitamin D levels for safety.
✪ ADMINISTERING & MONITORING THE PROTOCOL
After carefully reading that report in the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, Mr. Kramer contacted three of the U.S./Canadian doctors who were co-authors of the protocol. Because the protocol had not yet been approved for clinical trials and therefore was not FDA approved, they explained that they could not provide assistance without risking discipline, including potential loss of license to practice medicine, by their state/province medical boards. In response to a question about when a clinical trial for this protocol would be approved, their answers were consistent: it typically would take ten to twenty years to get a clinical trial approved, especially where no Big Pharma company would have a profit interest to lobby for a clinical trial of a protocol involving repurposed/off-patent drugs.
Pierrick Martinez, of the Association Cancer et Métabolisme in Nimes, France, a medical researcher and lead author of the protocol, was then contacted by Mr. Kramer. He agreed to provide “long-distance assistance” and supervised administering the entire 15-week protocol, including corresponding with the nurse practitioner who administered the megadose vitamin C intravenous infusions that were one part of the protocol and answering numerous questions along the way. A licensed nutritionist at a Cleveland Clinic oncology center in Mansfield, Ohio, was consulted for advice on how to implement the therapeutic ketogenic diet that was another part of the protocol.
Mr. Kramer completed the 15-week hybrid orthomolecular protocol on June 5, 2025, with no side effects whatsoever. Two weeks later, he received an FDG-PET scan at AVITA Hospital in Galion, Ohio. The radiologist’s report that followed showed no evidence of any active cancer anywhere in his body. Not in his head, hip bones, lumbar spine, chest, or lymph glands; nothing—no active cancer anywhere. In fact, it took the radiologist almost a full week to issue that report, for the PET scan was ordered to evaluate metastatic prostate cancer, deemed to be an incurable condition.
Perhaps most amazing, the total cost of the medicines, dietary vitamin/mineral supplements, and vitamin C infusions of this protocol was less than $20,000; a fraction of the cost of even one month’s expense for the cancer “management” medications that a Cleveland Clinic oncologist had previously prescribed as “the standard of care” for cancer treatment.
A mere $20,000 to stave off debilitating cancer and certain death was more than a bargain; it was a godsend to Mr. Kramer.
A very important note: the Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol was not developed specifically for treating prostate cancer, but rather for treating cancers in general. More specifically, Mr. Kramer’s first treatment for tonsil cancer significantly diminished his immune system such that he was advised that he would be progressively more vulnerable to follow-on cancers like prostate cancer, and this, of course, is what happened. Since he was cured by this protocol, others with immune systems damaged from conventional cancer treatment regimens could likely benefit from it as well.
✪ CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
One man was cured of his Stage 4 prostate cancer through the supervised administration of a new cancer protocol that featured the inexpensive repurposed drugs ivermectin and fenbendazol. “A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.” Was this a one-time miracle or a repeatable protocol that may help other cancer sufferers who are without hope?
Regardless, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services should expedite human trials for this protocol while publicizing this particular result and allowing other cancer sufferers to receive these treatments under the supervision of healthcare professionals. After all, what do they have to lose? Label this procedure as “experimental” if necessary, with the appropriate legal disclaimers, but the US Government should not stand in the way of a potentially life-saving cancer protocol. ✪
▶️ DONATE VIA PAYPAL (DEBIT & CREDIT CARD)
ALL PayPal Transactions Are Encrypted For Card Holder Privacy & Security
▶️ DONATE VIA ZELLE (DIRECT BANK CASH TRANSFER)
ZELLE is the perfect online alternative to PayPal. It’s an incredibly simple, secure, easy, fast and FREE way to send or receive money to recipients directly from your online banking account without a middleman. Best of all, there’s NO fees.
ZELLE is a service provided by your bank and is already built in to your online banking account. You only need to activate it first before using. If you’ve already activated ZELLE in your online bank or credit union account, you can donate to The New Americanist by using our ZELLE address:
vip@thenewamericanist.com
To activate your ZELLE, follow these easy instructions (a simple two minute process):
▶️ DONATE VIA SNAIL MAIL
▶️ RSBN LIVESTREAM LINK: Trump Announcement
⭐️ TokaiseBlessedPatriot
