▶️ VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: CAN THE DARK AGES RETURN?
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: CAN THE DARK AGES RETURN?
lll
estern Civilization arose in the 8th Century B.C. Greece. Some 1,500 city-states emerged from a murky, illiterate 400-year-old Dark Age. That chaos followed the utter collapse of the palatial culture of Mycenaean Greece.
But what reemerged were constitutional government, rationalism, liberty, freedom of expression, self-critique, and free markets; what we know now as the foundation of a unique Western Civilization.
History suggests civilizations fall when complacency, debt, and tribalism replace unity, discipline, and reform—prompting fears the West may be nearing a familiar decline.
The Roman Republic inherited and enhanced the Greek model. For a millennium, the Republic and subsequent Empire spread Western culture, eventually to be inseparable from Christianity.
From the Atlantic to the Persian Gulf and from the Rhine and Danube to the Sahara, there were a million square miles of safety, prosperity, progress, and science; until the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century AD.
What followed was a second European Dark Age, roughly from 500 to 1000 AD. Populations declined. Cities eroded. Roman roads, aqueducts, and laws crumbled.
In place of the old Roman provinces arose tribal chieftains and fiefdoms. Whereas once Roman law had protected even rural people in remote areas, during the Dark Ages, walls and stone were the only means of keeping safe.
Finally, at the end of the 11th Century, the old values and know-how of the complex world of Graeco-Roman civilization gradually reemerged.
The slow rebirth was later energized by the humanists and scientists of the Renaissance, Reformation, and eventually the 200-year European Enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries.
Contemporary Americans do not believe that our current civilization could self-destruct a third time in the West, followed by an impoverished and brutal Dark Age. But what caused these prior returns to tribalism and loss of science, technology, and the rule of law?
Historians cite several causes of societal collapse—and today they are hauntingly familiar. Like people, societies age. Complacency sets in.
The hard work and sacrifice that built the West also creates wealth and leisure. Such affluence is taken for granted by later generations. What created success is eventually ignored—or even mocked.
Expenditures and consumption outpace income, production, and investment. Child-rearing, traditional values, strong defense, love of country, religiosity, meritocracy, and empirical education fade away. The middle class of autonomous citizens disappear. Society bifurcates between a few lords and many peasants.
Tribalism—the pre-civilizational bonds based on race, religion, or shared appearance—remerge. National government fragments into regional and ethnic enclaves. Borders disappear. Mass migrations are unchecked. The age-old bane of anti-Semitism reappears.
The currency inflates, losing its value and confidence. General crassness in behavior, speech, dress, and ethics replaces prior norms. Transportation, communications, and infrastructure all decline. The end is near when the necessary medicine is seen as worse than the disease. Such was life around 450 AD in Western Europe.
The contemporary West might raise similar red flags. Fertility has dived well below 2.0 in almost every Western country. Public debt is nearing unsustainable levels. The dollar and euro have lost much of their purchasing power. It is more common in universities to damn than honor the gifts of the Western intellectual past.
Yet, the reading and analytical skills of average Westerners, and Americans in particular, steadily decline. Can the general population even operate or comprehend the ever-more sophisticated machines and infrastructure that an elite group of engineers and scientists creates?
The citizen loses confidence in an often corrupt elite, who neither will protect their nations’ borders nor spend sufficient money on collective defense. The cures are scorned.
Do we dare address spiraling deficits, unsustainable debt, and corrupt bureaucracies and entitlements? Even mention of reform is smeared as “greedy, racist, cruel,” or even “fascist” and “Nazi.”
In our times, relativism replaces absolute values in the eerie replay of the latter Roman Empire. Critical legal theory claims crimes are not really crimes.
Critical race theory postulates that all of society is guilty of insidious bias, demanding reparations in cash and preferences in admission and hiring.
Salad-bowl tribalism replaces assimilation, acculturation, and integration of the old melting pot.
Despite a far wealthier, far more leisured, and far more scientific contemporary America, was it safer to walk in New York or take the subway in 1960 than now?
Are high school students better at math now or 70 years ago? Are movies and television more entertaining and ennobling in 1940 or now? Are nuclear, two-parent families the norm currently or in 1955?
We are blessed to live longer and healthier lives than ever—even as the larger society around us seems to teeter. Yet, the West historically is uniquely self-introspective and self-critical.
Reform and Renaissance historically are more common than descents back into the Dark Ages.
But the medicine for decline requires unity, honesty, courage, and action—virtues now in short supply on social media, amid popular culture, and among the Political Class. ✪
▶️ JB SHURK: FREEDOM LOVERS AREN’T ‘FASCISTS’
JB SHURK: FREEDOM LOVERS AREN’T ‘FASCISTS’
nnn
eing called “right-wing” or “fascist” is detestable. The label implies a preference for dictatorship, authoritarianism, and government supremacy over personal freedom. The exact opposite is true. I would describe myself as a supporter of autarchism in the sense that we should rule ourselves and not be ruled by others. There’s nothing ‘right-wing’ about defending the Bill of Rights.
As someone who believes strongly in individual liberty, self-reliance, and self-government, I distrust all repositories of power — whether such power resides in government, corporations, or social institutions. As Lord Acton advised: “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In my estimation, nothing in this physical world can be trusted with power for very long. Regrettably, all forms of power eventually become abusive.
Nineteenth-century diplomat and political writer John O’Sullivan (the man who coined the phrase “manifest destiny” in 1845) helped to popularize a sentiment shared by other luminaries of his time such as Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Mark Twain: “The best government is that which governs least.”
Government is Leviathan. It knows only how to grow its size and the number of its tentacles until it is capable of wrapping its predacious powers around everyone and everything.
Emissaries of Big Government globalism speak of government as a benevolent “friend” and “parent” whose job is to “protect” and “take care of” the people. But government is none of those things. Government is coercion. It is force, including the threat of lethal force. It robs people of their labor in the form of taxes. It presumes to know what is best for everyone. It insists on telling people how to use their property and how to live their lives. It intrudes into family households and inserts itself between parents and children. Whereas a friend will fight beside you and a parent will sacrifice everything for your well-being, governments start wars recklessly, sacrifice citizens callously, and ignore the pleas of those suffering.
The German Nazis, Italian Fascists, Soviet Communists, and Chinese Maoists were all Big Government socialists who justified murdering their citizens for the good of the government. Government is not a “friend” or a “parent.” It is a homicidal maniac that society tries to keep somewhat restrained lest it indulge its basest instinct: to kill everyone in its path.
Government does not “protect” people. It uses people to its advantage. Government does not “take care of” people. It bullies them, steals from them, and keeps them divided against each other. Anybody praising the “virtues” of Big Government is nothing more than a macabre salesman for institutional slavery, indemnified violence, and legalized theft.
Those of us who identify as liberty lovers and defenders of freedom harbor profound distrust of government. It is therefore galling when Big Government leftists, socialists, globalists, Marxists, and even outright communists (especially those exercising power as so-called “journalists” working for multinational corporate news organizations) call us “right-wing.”
What is “right-wing” about wanting government bureaucrats to just leave us the hell alone? I try to put myself in the small wingtips of someone such as CNN’s Brian Stelter. When I say, “I want government out of my life,” how does he hear, “Right-wing fascism is overtaking America?” Is Brian obtuse? Maliciously dishonest? Both?
I find it perplexing to hear Stelter, Jake Tapper, and their fellow ideological clones on cable news describe those of us who most ardently defend the Bill of Rights as somehow being threats to American freedom. Look around the universe of political writers today, and you will find that almost all of the staunchest advocates for free speech, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms, and protections from warrantless government searches and mass surveillance are Americans whom Stelter, Tapper, and their cohorts would describe as “right-wing.”
On the other hand, the very Leftists and globalists whom CNN anchors adore are daily calling for mass censorship in the name of fighting “disinformation” and “hate speech.” Stelter has made an entire career out of playing a “truth-telling hall monitor” who believes he is empowered to tell social media companies what should be stricken from public debate. He has explicitly called for a “harm reduction model” of permissible speech by illogically claiming that “reducing a liar’s reach is not the same as censoring freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is different than freedom of reach.” He defends censorship in the name of “freedom” because he expects to be the corporate news umpire who gets to decide what is true or false.
Could there possibly be anything more authoritarian than CNN personalities claiming the authority to declare official truths?
Nonetheless, CNN ignores its own assaults on free speech and instead decries “right-wingers” who believe parents should have a say over whether elementary school libraries include books on “transgenderism,” abortion, sexual fetishes, and pornography. CNN’s talking heads even call those of us who oppose “drag queen story hour” for kindergartners “Christian nationalists” — as if trying to be a moral person, a faithful Christian, a protective parent, and a patriotic American were the hallmarks of “fascism.”
Effective communication between human beings is difficult even when people speak the same language, share the same culture, and enjoy similar beliefs. When politicians and “journalists” defame as “fascists” those of us who fight for expansive personal freedom and against government tyranny, they rob society of peaceful public discourse and light the fuse of future violence.
Those in the “journalism” business who use words to sell fear and provoke bloodshed know exactly what they’re doing. When you demonize your political enemies long enough, some eventually get murdered. Charlie Kirk wasn’t the first, and he will not be the last. After all, there is an entire army of fascist Antifa terrorists who hunt “right-wingers” for sport. Or is that too much truth for Stelter’s “harm reduction model” to permit me to say out loud? ✪
▶️ DON SURBER: ASSIMILATE OR GO HOME
⭐️ Jorline
DON SURBER: ASSIMILATE OR GO HOME
lll
h no. Trump has a zeal for enforcing the law. It is as if he believes no one is above the law. The New York Times whined:
✪✪✪✪✪
The Trump Administration plans to ramp up efforts to strip some naturalized Americans of their citizenship, according to internal guidance obtained by The New York Times, marking an aggressive new phase in President Trump’s immigration crackdown.
The guidance, issued on Tuesday to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services field offices, asks that they “supply Office of Immigration Litigation with 100-200 denaturalization cases per month” in the 2026 fiscal year. If the cases are successful, it would represent a massive escalation of denaturalization in the modern era, experts said. By comparison, between 2017 and this year to date, there had been just over 120 cases filed, according to the Justice Department.
Under federal law, people may be denaturalized only if they committed fraud while applying for citizenship, or in a few other narrow circumstances. But the Trump administration has shown a zeal for using every tool at its disposal to target legal and illegal immigrants, leading activists to warn that such a campaign could sweep up people who had made honest mistakes on their citizenship paperwork and sow fear among law-abiding Americans.
✪✪✪✪✪
This is the same publication that cheered Alvin Bragg’s zeal to imprison Trump over campaign paperwork. Now the newspaper seeks to shield people who made “honest mistakes on their citizenship paperwork.” You know like failing to disclose that you were a Nazi prison guard at a death camp during the war.
NYT buried in Paragraph 13, “The Justice Department previously also said it would make denaturalization a priority this year. In a memo distributed in the summer, officials laid out their approach, saying they would target individuals in an array of categories beyond committing fraud in obtaining citizenship. Categories of eligible people include gang members, those who committed financial fraud, individuals connected to drug cartels and violent criminals, according to the department.”
Being a gang member terrorizing the people of Aurora, Colorado, is not an honest mistake on citizenship paperwork.
Distributing fentanyl that turns Americans into corpses or zombies is not an honest mistake on citizenship paperwork.
Ripping off $8 billion—$8,000,000,000—from the government in Minnesota is not an honest mistake on citizenship paperwork.
Marrying your brother to dodge immigration law is not an honest mistake on citizenship paperwork.
The real problem with immigration—both legal and illegal—is a determined resistance to assimilation, which is the key successful immigration. Our values are not theirs and that defeats the whole purpose of welcoming newcomers to America. They want to turn America into the lands they left behind.
The situation was encapsulated in one tweet by Steven M. Legacy:
▶️ 2 Minutes 1 Second
City Council voted to allow animal sacrifice for religious purposes in the city of Hamtramck, Michigan. Savage people committing savage acts. Who would have thought? Hamtramck used to be a beautiful Polish community until it was overrun and conquered by the third worlders.
The Poles fit in. They brought their sausage, their work ethic and polka music with them. These were gifts to the USA. Within three generations, they fully blended in.
That is because they came from a culture that aligned with American values. We might not have won the Revolutionary War without Casimir Pulaski and Thaddeus Kościuszko. Their culture is a blessing.
▶️ 6 Minutes 8 Seconds
The Muslims are a curse.They opened the new century by destroying the Twin Towers and attacking the Pentagon. You cannot blame a whole group of people for the acts of 19 individuals? Why not? Conservatives still hear about Timothy McVeigh 24 years after his execution for the Oklahoma City bombing.
Animal sacrifices to Baal or whomever are Third World rituals that serve to undo centuries of progress by America. Bring your food, your music and some of your language (the English vocabulary vacuums verbiage) but leave your child marriages, your lying to infidels and your animal sacrifices behind.
The invasion by Muslims is real. Paris canceled its annual New Year’s Eve celebration, Gary Cartwright opined:
This week’s attack on the Jewish community in Australia, reportedly carried out by Muslim gunmen and now under intense investigation by the authorities, has sent a chill through Western capitals. It was not simply another act of violence; it was a reminder that anti-Semitic jihadist violence is not confined to one continent or one set of political circumstances. From Sydney to Paris, the pattern is increasingly recognizable: symbolic targets, communal spaces, moments of celebration.
Seen in this light, Paris’s muted New Year feels less like administrative caution and more like an admission of reality – Europe’s Muslim population has its own ideas about Europe’s future.
The Champs-Élysées has long been more than a boulevard. It is a statement — of openness, civic confidence and national pride. To cancel a live concert there, even while allowing fireworks to proceed, is to draw a subtle but telling distinction between spectacle and congregation. Fireworks can be controlled. Crowds cannot. And crowds have become dangerously attractive targets.
Europe knows this all too well. Christmas markets, once the embodiment of seasonal warmth and civic joy, have repeatedly been turned into killing grounds. Berlin’s Breitscheidplatz in 2016 remains etched into the continent’s memory, when an Islamist terrorist ploughed a lorry into revelers, killing 12. Strasbourg followed in 2018, when a gunman shouting Islamist slogans murdered shoppers near the city’s Christmas market. There have been others — attempted attacks foiled, quieted down, or forgotten outside the communities they traumatized.
▶️ 1 Minute 7 Seconds
It is not a phobia if the fear is based on real events. The Minnesota Star Tribune tweeted, “Somali American Leadership Taskforce (SALT) members described wide-ranging economic fallout during the press conference Wednesday, noting that Somali-owned groceries, restaurants and malls have seen sharp drops in customers over the last two weeks.”
Are you smiling? Because I sure am. ✪
▶️ UKRAINE: MONEY TODAY OR BLOOD TOMORROW
UKRAINE: MONEY TODAY OR BLOOD TOMORROW
jjj
urope faces a question of “money today, or blood tomorrow,” its leaders were told as they entered crunch meetings on whether to approve a financial structure using frozen Russian assets to enable a mega loan to Ukraine.
The leaders of European Union member states met for a session of the European Council on Thursday, talks which are expected to go all day, for discussions on using frozen Russian assets held in European countries to guarantee a loan to Ukraine to keep it solvent. The European Union believes Kyiv needs a cash injection of $160 billion to pay for its military and civil expenses for the next two years, and that it faces running out of money as soon as Spring if urgent action isn’t taken.
This morning, President Zelensky said if the deal isn’t passed, “there will be a big problem for Ukraine.” Ursula von der Leyen, meanwhile, stated, “we have one ultimate goal in this European Council, and that is peace for Ukraine, peace through strength, and for that, Ukraine needs to have a secure funding for the next two years… the most important part is that, at the end of the day, we have secured the funding for Ukraine.”
In the past, European states have helped fund Ukraine’s national defence by using the interest earned on the approximately $250 billion in Russian assets held by European banks. Under the new plan, Ukraine would be loaned the Russian capital itself, which is being counted against hypothetical future Russian reparation payments to Ukraine. In essence, Russia would pay Ukraine war reparations following an assumed future military defeat, which would allow Kyiv to repay the loan to Brussels, which would in turn allow the EU to give Russia its seized assets back, states the BBC.
Several key European partners profess concern about this approach, and no less than the government of Belgium, the home of the Euroclear Securities System where the majority of that Russian wealth is held. Belgium has so far blocked the idea because it is worried Russia will, in time, take its revenge on their country for allowing the money entrusted there to be used in the war. Thursday’s meetings are largely intended to find ways to either assuage or override Belgium’s concerns.
Hungary is another European state standing against the war loan, and against cash support for Ukraine in general, feelings stemming both from its bad relationship with Kyiv that well predates the Russian invasions, and out of its desire not to push Europe into an all-out war with Russia. Expressing his case against the loan, Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban is reported to have said before going into today’s talks:
“The whole idea is stupid. … There are two countries which are at war – it’s not European Union, [it’s] Russia and Ukraine – and the European Union would like to take away the money of one of the warring party and then to give it to another one. It’s marching into the war. The Belgian prime minister is right, we should not do that.”
The loan idea is also opposed behind the scenes by the United States, The Times of London states overnight, with Washington reportedly lobbying European nations to block the deal because it is antithetical to President Trump’s ongoing bid for peace. Taking Russia’s frozen assets and using them to fund the war removes incentives for Moscow to sit at the negotiating table and agree to a deal, it is said the Trump team believes, because the prospect of reintegrating its economy with the wider world becomes a more remote prospect.
The Times cited an unnamed Ukrainian official as their source, and also printed a dismissal by White House press secretary Anna Kelly, who said: “Spitballing from anonymous sources who were not present for these discussions should not be taken seriously.”
Meanwhile the pressure on European countries to approve the loan deal continues. Poland, perhaps the most hawkish country in Europe on Russia — given in any theoretical future war its national territory would inevitably become the eastern European battleground — painted a picture of the Ukraine loan as a necessary down payment on future peace.
Prime Minister and former Eurocrat Donald Tusk said of the proposed deal: “we have a simple choice: either money today, or blood tomorrow… I’m not talking about Ukraine only, I’m talking about Europe.”
Russia, for its part, seems to have promised blood either way. President Vladimir Putin called the loan proposal “piracy,” the European states proposing it “swine” or “piglets,” and Moscow warned of “the harshest” retaliation.✪
▶️ DECLINE: THE OSCARS MOVE FROM NETWORKS TO YOUTUBE
DECLINE: THE OSCARS MOVE FROM NETWORKS TO YOUTUBE
mmm
n a reflection of Hollywood’s ongoing decline, the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences announced the Academy Awards will depart from network TV and move to streaming on YouTube beginning in 2029. The ceremony will continue on ABC through 2028, the 100th Anniversary of the Oscars.
Ratings for the show have been on a steady downward decline for years for reasons that seem obvious to everyone except people in Hollywood. America stopped paying attention because people don’t want to be lectured about politics from rich liberals who live in a bubble.
Ratings for the once ‘must-watch tv’ have continued to decline in recent years, including record lows in 2021, 2022, and 2023. AP reports:
Starting in 2029, YouTube will retain global rights to streaming the Oscars through 2033. YouTube will effectively be the home to all things Oscars, including red-carpet coverage, the Governors Awards and the Oscar nominations announcement.
“We are thrilled to enter into a multifaceted global partnership with YouTube to be the future home of the Oscars and our year-round Academy programming,” said academy chief executive Bill Kramer and academy president Lynette Howell Taylor.
“The Academy is an international organization, and this partnership will allow us to expand access to the work of the Academy to the largest worldwide audience possible — which will be beneficial for our Academy members and the film community.”
Over the years, the ceremony has become an opportunity for out-of-touch stars to signal their woke beliefs and attack Donald Trump and his supporters.
New diversity rules were imposed by the Oscars several years ago, which stipulate that to be eligible for the “Best Picture” award, films must meet two of four specified diversity benchmarks.
▶️ 3 Minutes 47 Seconds
Fresh from her Oscar win for Best Supporting Actress for her work in Everything Everywhere All at Once, Jamie Lee Curtis ensured that woke politics were front and center by tearfully announcing that she had given her Oscar statue they/them pronouns in support of her trans daughter, Ruby.
In his speech, “Everything Everywhere All at Once” co-director Daniel Scheinert thanked his parents for letting him dress in drag as a child as the crowd roared their approval.
▶️ 1 Minute 27 Seconds
In 2024, host Jimmy Kimmel went on a Trump Derangement-fueled rant. ✪
▶️ DEMS PLAN NEW GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN IN JANUARY
DEMS PLAN NEW GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN IN JANUARY
mmm
uring an interview aired on Wednesday’s “PBS NewsHour,” Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA) responded to a question on whether Democrats should shut the government down over healthcare by saying that he doesn’t want a shutdown, but “it’s gotten to that situation where we’ve had to shut down the government in order to fix our differences.”
▶️ 9 Minutes 27 Seconds
“NewsHour” Correspondent Lisa Desjardins asked, “There’s a funding deadline in January, at the end of January. Should Democrats demand healthcare action in return for funding government again?”
Panetta responded, “Look, that’s what we demanded during the shutdown, and we got to this point right now. And, hopefully, that’s something where we’ll be able to fix it in early January, because the last thing we want is a government shutdown. That’s not what I wanted back then. It’s not what I’ve wanted throughout my time in Congress. But, unfortunately, it’s gotten to that situation where we’ve had to shut down the government in order to fix our differences. Hopefully, this is something, with this discharge petition, we can pass it out of the House, get it to the Senate, and then have something, a foundation to extend the tax credits well before the budget deadline.”✪
▶️ TRUMP ORDER RECLASSIFIES MARIJUANA AS SCHEDULE III DRUG
TRUMP ORDER RECLASSIFIES MARIJUANA AS SCHEDULE III DRUG
mmm
resident Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to reschedule marijuana as a Schedule III drug and to promote cannabinoid research.
Trump signed the order flanked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a plethora of doctors, and cancer survivors in the Oval Office.
▶️ 36 Minutes 6 Seconds
“Today, I’m pleased to announce that I will be signing an executive order to reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance with legitimate medical uses,” Trump said.
Trump noted that patients have long advocated for rescheduling cannabis:
For decades, this action has been requested by American patients suffering from extreme pain, incurable diseases, aggressive cancers, seizure disorders, neurological problems, and more, including numerous veterans with service-related injuries, and older Americans who live with chronic medical problems that severely degrade their quality of life…. I think I probably have received more phone calls on this, on doing what we’re doing. I don’t think I received any calls on the other side of it.
Under the order, Attorney General Pam Bondi is directed to expedite marijuana’s reclassification.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Legislative, Political, and Public Affairs is tasked with working with Congress on making “appropriate full-spectrum CBD products” accessible to Americans, while still restricting the sale of products that pose serious health risks, per a White House fact sheet.
“The Order directs HHS to develop research methods and models utilizing real-world evidence to improve access to hemp-derived cannabinoid products in accordance with Federal law and to inform standards of care,” it adds.
Trump clarified that his order in no way legalizes the drug or legalizes recreational use: Trump called on young Americans not to do drugs recreationally.
▶️ 2 Minutes 5 Seconds
I want to emphasize that the order I am about to sign doesn’t legalize marijuana in any way, shape, or form, and in no way sanctions its use as a recreational drug–it’s nothing to do with it. Just as the prescription painkillers may have legitimate uses, but can also do irreversible damage..It’s never safe to use powerful controlled substances in recreational matters, and especially in this case if you take a look, illegal and unregulated drugs, very very bad thing.
Oz announced that CMS will announce “a new model and additional actions to give seniors access to cannabinoids.”
“These are CBDs. They’re not addictive, which many are already using to manage pain,” he said.
“There’s some clinical evidence that’s showing that CBDs provide relief from common conditions that affect Americans, including cancer symptoms and chronic pain, and a slew of other problems that affect disproportionately seniors and our veterans,” Oz continued. ✪
▶️ DONATE VIA PAYPAL (DEBIT & CREDIT CARD)
ALL PayPal Transactions Are Encrypted For Card Holder Privacy & Security
▶️ DONATE VIA ZELLE (DIRECT BANK CASH TRANSFER)
ZELLE is the perfect online alternative to PayPal. It’s an incredibly simple, secure, easy, fast and FREE way to send or receive money to recipients directly from your online banking account without a middleman. Best of all, there’s NO fees.
ZELLE is a service provided by your bank and is already built in to your online banking account. You only need to activate it first before using. If you’ve already activated ZELLE in your online bank or credit union account, you can donate to The New Americanist by using our ZELLE address:
vip@thenewamericanist.com
To activate your ZELLE, follow these easy instructions (a simple two minute process):
▶️ DONATE VIA SNAIL MAIL
▶️ RSBN LIVESTREAM LINK: Trump Announcement From The White House
▶️ RSBN LIVESTREAM LINK: DAY TWO Of TPUSA America Fest
▶️ RSBN LIVESTREAM LINK: Trump Remarks @ Rocky Mount, NC
⭐️ TokaiseBlessedPatriot
