▶️ TRUMP: MAJOR ELECTION INTERFERENCE FROM CHINA
TRUMP: MAJOR ELECTION INTERFERENCE FROM CHINA
kkk
resident Donald Trump on Thursday unveiled a bombshell tranche of files he emphasized detail China’s interference in American elections, particularly in 2020, as well as major election vulnerabilities.
Detailing the findings, which the president emphasized have been reviewed by “top intelligence agency chiefs,” Trump laid out numerous critical areas of concern, beginning with China. Documents released by the White House are available here.
▶️ 1 Minute 21 Seconds
The President said the People’s Republic of China (PRC) illicitly acquired a whopping 220 million U.S. voter files through “what is believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history.” Trump said:
“That information includes names, addresses, phone numbers, political party preferences, and other sensitive data that would be needed to register to vote and engage in other nefarious activities, which is exactly what was happening. This data loss presents an unprecedented election security nightmare. The intelligence even shows that China assigned a data exploitation unit specifically to this new project.”
Trump said another key area of concern is a “Deep State” cover-up of the extent of China’s meddling. He continued:
“Compounding the travesty, the second set of documents we are releasing reveals that members of the deep state … in our intelligence agency worked to actively suppress and downplay information about the extent of China’s sinister election meddling, covering it up from both the president and the American people like nobody thought was possible.”
He also said while outlining the second area of documents:
“CIA reporting explicitly stated, and I quote: ‘In mid 2018, the Chinese Communist Party’s policy was to leverage all domestic and foreign elements that were opposed to the U.S. president in an effort to reduce the U.S. president’s votes and make him resign or prevent his re-election.’”
Trump went on to add that “Raw intelligence obtained by the FBI in 2020, yet buried by rogue bureaucrats, stated that China’s activities even included an attempt to manufacture illegal ballots for Joe Biden.”
Trump added that the documents reveal that reports regarding “China’s election targeting” were omitted from his daily presidential briefs during his first term. He added:
“Documents show that during this period, dozens of significant CIA and NSA reports about China’s election targeting were kept out of the presidential briefing. These were briefings I would get almost every day. Everything was kept out that was of importance. One email among intelligence analysts admitted that they had quote: ‘deliberately massaged the presidential daily briefing to withhold information regarding Chinese activities related to the election.”
The third set of documents “proves that for many years Americans were blatantly lied to about the security of our election infrastructure, including electronic voting machines and ballot counting systems, dishonest almost all,” the President said, adding:
They’re vulnerable and they’re easily compromised, and people within our government knew that. Tonight, we’re publishing a series of previously classified U.S. intelligence community assessments and other reports proving that our government has long known these machines are extremely exposed to attack. As one assessment states, we judge that the United States adversaries, including at a minimum Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, as well as non-state groups, have the capability to compromise U.S. election infrastructure.
Trump said documents “show the CIA obtained reporting of a specific plot to do a big number in favor of the corrupt Maduro regime in Venezuela, and that’s exactly what happened, conspiring to digitally rig their own country’s elections in 2020, and that’s what they did.”
The fourth set shows “significant evidence of fraud” was “buried and covered up,” Trump said, pointing to “FBI files detailing evidence of alleged fraud by a large-scale voter registration operation in Michigan.” He added:
In 2020, Michigan State Police raided a Democrat Get Out the Vote organization, corrupt group, in Muskegon, and were so concerned by what they found … that they contacted the FBI in Detroit. The documents state that some canvassers admitted to FBI agents that they signed voter registration forms in other people’s names, submitted fraudulent registration for people who did not exist, and received gift cards tied to their number of applications that they produced. In other words, it was pay, play, and cheat.
The final area of documents is a release of a Department of Homeland Security investigation, which uncovered hundreds of thousands of noncitizens registered to vote in federal elections, he said:
According to the DHS review, state voter rolls, and public records, they identified approximately 278,000 non-citizens who are registered to vote in federal elections. Since Democrat states refuse to share their voter files, the real number is actually much higher than that. Yet, even this limited analysis found more than a quarter of a million foreigners illegally registered to vote.
The President added that the information he detailed throughout the address shows “an election system so broken and so vulnerable that no one can possibly defend it” ✪
▶️ AMERICA IS IN TROUBLE & RUNNING OUT OF TIME
AMERICA IS IN TROUBLE & RUNNING OUT OF TIME
lll
he numbers are mathematical, not political. Unless the United States begins restoring fiscal discipline, future generations will inherit a nation burdened by debt, weakened by chronic overspending, and headed into a bankruptcy which could have been prevented.
Washington is run by professional politicians, not statesmen, whose focus is on the next election, not the next generation. They have operated under a simple formula. Promise more benefits, avoid difficult decisions, and borrow for the difference. Politicians of both parties have found it easier to finance today’s priorities with tomorrow’s dollars than to ask voters to accept the tradeoffs required for responsible budgeting. Voters reward this and vote for them. The result has been a steady erosion of America’s financial foundation.
Most Americans understandably do not spend their evenings reading Treasury reports or Congressional Budget Office projections. They are focused on raising families, running businesses, paying mortgages, and keeping up with the rising cost of living. Yet the government’s financial statements tell a story that should concern every one of us. The reports make clear that our financial direction is unsustainable.
The Federal Government now carries more than $39 trillion in interest-bearing debt, and that total continues to grow by roughly $2 trillion to $3 trillion each year. If current trends continue, the debt could approach $70 trillion within the next decade. Meanwhile, unfunded obligations for Social Security and Medicare (promises to recipients for which there are no funds to cover) are estimated at approximately $7 trillion, while annual interest payments on the national debt have climbed above $1.1 trillion and continue rising rapidly.
Those figures are the unavoidable consequences of spending more than the Government collects year after year, not partisan talking points.
The outlook for America’s major entitlement programs is equally troubling. Social Security and Medicare trust funds will be exhausted in six and seven years, respectively. Under current law, at that point, benefits cannot continue at their currently promised levels. Unless Congress acts, Social Security benefits would be reduced by roughly 22 percent, while Medicare benefits would be reduced by 11 percent. Every year meaningful reforms are delayed, the options become fewer, and the necessary adjustments become more painful.
History demonstrates that fiscal crises rarely arrive without warning. Governments can borrow heavily for years, sometimes decades, creating the illusion that rising debt carries few consequences. Eventually, however, confidence begins to erode. Investors demand higher interest rates, borrowing becomes more expensive, deficits accelerate, and governments find themselves trapped in a ‘doom loop’ that will eventually lead to bankruptcy.
No country in the world’s history has survived forever, and financial problems have been the chief problem. Will we go the way of past countries, or address our problems and prosper?
Informed citizens recognize this problem, but most of our citizens are not aware of how serious the problems are. This week, Michael Bloomberg in his opinion piece argued that advanced economies, particularly the United States, have accumulated so much debt that the next financial crisis could be fundamentally different from the one experienced in 2008. During that crisis, governments possessed the financial capacity to rescue the banking system. If governments themselves become financially overextended, Bloomberg asks an uncomfortable but necessary question: Who rescues the governments? We are not too big to fail; we are too big to save!
The conclusion is both practical and sobering. Restoring fiscal discipline will require political courage, spending restraint, and bipartisan compromise. Americans may disagree over the specific policies needed to achieve those goals, but the underlying reality is becoming increasingly difficult to deny. Debt matters. Delaying action only guarantees that future solutions will be more disruptive and more painful. The United States has long benefited from extraordinary economic strength, deep capital markets, and the confidence of investors around the world. Those advantages have provided tremendous flexibility, but they are not cast in stone. We are rapidly squandering those advantages.
The solution begins with economic education. The American people must understand the seriousness of these challenges and demand that their elected representatives fix the fiscal mess they have created. Every citizen should ask one simple question: Are you comfortable leaving your children and grandchildren a country that is essentially bankrupt and headed toward failure? If the answer is yes, then continue pretending nothing is wrong. Problem? What problem? But if the answer is no, then the time to act is now.
Americans should demand fiscal responsibility. They should demand honest leadership. They should demand that Washington stop mortgaging our children’s future to pay for today’s political promises. And if elected officials refuse to act, voters should make it clear that they will support someone who will. Nothing commands the attention of politicians more than the prospect of losing an election.
The numbers tell the story. They are mathematical, not political, and they cannot be negotiated away or ignored forever. The only question that remains is whether Americans are willing to listen and act before the final curtain falls on the greatest economic success story in history. ✪
▶️ THE ‘EXTREME PASSION’ OF SOCIALISM HAS A HIGH BODY COUNT
THE ‘EXTREME PASSION’ OF SOCIALISM HAS A HIGH BODY COUNT
fff
e need fewer lawyers, political science majors, and theater kids in Congress; and we need far more historians. If we had more of the latter, maybe we could have avoided the impending socialist takeover of the Democrat Party. While Republicans like Mike Johnson and Marco Rubio, who came from families who fled the atrocities of Cuban communism, can sound the alarm bells, Democrats are scrambling to figure out how to respond to the latest insurgence of socialists and communists into their ranks.
Some, like Colorado Governor Jared Polis, are speaking the truth: the socialists will destroy his state. Others are feigning ignorance of what socialism and communism really are all about; probably in the hopes of appeasing the Bolshevik mobs into shooting them last. Others are saying the quiet part out loud without realizing.
That latest is the approach Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear is taking, dismissing the zealotry in his party as people who simply have an ‘extreme passion’ for their agenda.
▶️ 15 Seconds
“Many who are running under the ‘Democratic Socialist’ brand or the progressive brand are making their case with just extreme passion,” Beshear said. “They’re convincing voters that they will work as hard as they can and that’s what voters are asking for right now.”
This is where knowing a little history would prove to be very helpful. The ‘extreme passion’ we’re seeing from American socialists has reared its ugly head before in other places with disastrous results. During Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), Mao encouraged the Chinese youth to rebel against ‘capitalist roaders’ within the Chinese Communist Party. He encouraged them to break ties with their families in favor of party devotion (gee, doesn’t that sound familiar?). In one instance, Zhang Hongbing reported his mother to the authorities. She was arrested, tortured, and executed by firing squad two months later. He was only 16 years old at the time and later regretted his actions. However, that ‘extreme passion’ led to the death of his mother and millions of others. The lucky ones ended up in prisons.
In the Soviet Union, the Komsomol and Pioneers were the movements which indoctrinated the youth. They, too, were encouraged to denounce and report family members, and the children of those who were purged were stigmatized and re-educated. Families deemed as ‘enemies of the people’ were often sent to prison camps or executed.
Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge, heavily influenced by Mao, taught children to be loyal to ‘Angkar’ (the Party) over all else. They participated in or witnessed killings, and about 1.7 innocent million people died.
All told, the ‘extreme passion’ of the communists and socialists put at minimum 100 million people in mass graves during the 20th Century alone.
That’s not what voters want, either, contrary to what Beshear claims. In Wisconsin, Republicans statewide are outpacing Democrats in fundraising, including Tom Tiffany, who is far ahead of Democratic Socialist Francesca Hong.
Nationally, Speaker Mike Johnson has raised a record-breaking $135 million for Republican causes, and the RNC has more than $125 million cash on hand and no outstanding debts, while the DNC is $16 million in debt with only $12.6 million cash on hand.
It’s not surprising to me Americans who just elected Donald Trump would bristle at embracing an ideology that so hates white people, hates America, and wants to usher in an Islamo-Communist dictatorship.
I’ve argued in the past the Democratic Socialists are simply saying out loud the things most other Democrats are already thinking; and Beshear just confirmed that theory. The Democrats, the mainstream ones, not the socialist nutters, have been pushing to abolish ICE with no plan to address immigration enforcement.
That’s a de facto abolition of our immigration laws and our borders, by the way. And a de facto demolition of our country. After all, if you don’t have borders, you don’t have a country.
And that’s only one case the socialists are making with ‘extreme passion.’ They want to grant all illegal aliens amnesty, erase our borders, defund the police, destroy our prisons, repeal the Constitution and replace it with the Communist Manifesto, abolish the Senate and make the Supreme Court and President subservient to a unicameral Congress they’ll permanently control with an iron fist.
That’s not ‘extreme passion.’ That’s radical activism. That’s the end of America. And idiots like Beshear seem just fine with that. ✪
▶️ THE NEW US INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION RUNS ON DATA CENTERS
THE NEW US INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION RUNS ON DATA CENTERS
uuuu
merican technological infrastructure provides the backbone of our modern lives. And data centers play an ever increasing role. They are not some side accessory or fringe zoning dispute. Data centers now account for a significant part of the expanding physical foundation of the American economy. They are the functional infrastructure required position the United States better re-industrialize and onshore our economy. They also give us the tools and power we need to compete with China.
The loudest voices working to stop data center build outs fall into two categories: those who are simply misinformed about the actual purpose & capabilities of these facilities; and, those whom are being actively used to, knowingly or not, convince American communities to fight against inevitable future economic growth & their own country’s best competitive interests.
It seems as if every generation becomes involved some sort of infrastructure fight. An earlier generation argued over national interstate highway build out. Thanks to a very similar hysteria, another set America’s nuclear energy development back half a century. Today, the current NIMBY struggle is over big warehouses full of computer servers known as data centers; and, whether America can continue building the physical machinery infrastructure which will be necessary to run our new age of innovation.
Let’s be honest about exactly what’s at stake. Data centers aren’t optional or luxury items. They are already in the background behind almost everything we do. Virtually every text message, every hospital record, every weather forecast, and every question you type into your keyboard passes through one of these buildings. And right now, the United States and China are locked in an heated race to see which can source the most computing power through these facilities. It’s very likely whoever wins this buildout race will end up dominating the world with the most valuable technology of the next 50 years.
To get a sense of how close that race really is, this week the Chinese company Moonshot AI officially launched its newest AI model platform, called Kimi K3, and it’s creating lots of attention online. Multiple reports rate it at roughly 2.5 trillion parameters, which would make it the largest open-source AI model ever released out of China. That means it has the ability to parse, read and reason over documents nearly 1 million words long in only a fraction of a second.
Ahead of the Kimi K3 launch, the Financial Times reported industry insiders expected Kimi K3 to match, or even beat, Anthropic’s flagship model, Claude Opus 4.8, and early benchmarks already show it beating OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 on several coding tests. The potential for China to usurp America in AI isn’t an hypothetical risk waiting in some future decade; it’s our most current challenge and economic reality. However, if anti-innovation politicians like Governor Kathy Hochul have their way and impose sweeping data center restrictions, moratoriums and bans, America could very well find itself losing this vital, technological race for the future.
Yes, everyone is already aware there is plenty of negative press about data centers, but there are always two sides to every story. Yes, these centers do require & consume large quantities of water and electricity; but the companies building them have been working to provide new solutions to these problems. Microsoft is now building data centers designed to use little to almost no water at all by using a sealed, recycled cooling loop design instead of traditionally allowing water just to evaporate into the open air.
Google is paying to construct water-restoration projects which will put more water into local supplies than its data centers use. Big Tech companies are also increasingly resorting to building their own internal power plants to supply dedicated power. This includes the prospect of their own smaller, localized nuclear projects. An incredible amount of engineering innovation is also taking place along with the construction of data centers.
Of course, that still doesn’t mean data center projects shouldn’t be subject to intense public scrutiny, especially when locations are proposed next to or within urban areas.
Data centers also stand to tremendously bolster the tax revenues for local governments. In Loudoun County, Virginia, officials are expecting almost an additional $900 million surplus in property tax revenues from its data centers this year alone. Missouri’s data centers also routinely bring in hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue during a single year. Much of that available money goes straight back into schools, local infrastructure, and even property tax reductions for citizens.
Next, consider the tens of millions of dollars invested in new construction; in addition to the creation of numerous high paying jobs. Of course, this doesn’t mean every data center project is going to be ideal; as some could become bad deals for taxpayers. However, that also provides incentive and opportunities for communities to negotiate better deals before they approve construction.
Some of the loudest “grassroots” opposition to data centers surprisingly isn’t grassroots at all. An investigation by the Bitcoin Policy Institute traced a network of activist nonprofits funded by Neville Roy Singham, an American businessman who sold his consulting company for $785 million in 2017 and is now living in Shanghai, China, working alongside Chinese state media outlets to fund political opposition to thwart developing American AI infrastructure.
The report links the Chinese network funded by Singham to campaigns which helped to delay or block roughly $23.6 billion in American data center projects by encouraging local construction bans and freezes around the country. Singham also funds CodePink, a anti-American poltical organization run by his wife, Jodie Evans. Code Pink has also openly embraced active resistance against American data centers, citing their development and construction constitutes a “new Cold War being waged against China;” A claim and position which have been parroted by the Chinese State Media.
CBS News recently reported Singham is now under criminal investigation by a Federal grand jury in New York. The grand jury is looking into whether Singham has violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). The investigation has also expanded into a wider criminal tax investigation over whether he has illegally laundered money through the numerous nonprofits he controls. In Congress, the head of the House Ways and Means Committee has demanded documents on whether Singham’s groups are directly coordinating with Chinese officials to directly interfere with American data center projects.
Public inquiry & involvement into new data centers in your town or city is important because there are always genuine concerns regarding development projects of this magnitude. Conversely, there are also always risks of foreign-linked influence or covert astroturf campaigns aimed at deliberately thwarting American infrastructure and innovation.
We can’t afford to allow local campaigns of misinformation or unfriendly foreign countries to adversely influence America into falling behind her competitors in the greatest infrastructure expansion so far of the 21st Century. ✪
▶️ BLUE STATE TAXPAYERS ARE LEAVING FOR GREENER PASTURES
BLUE STATE TAXPAYERS ARE LEAVING FOR GREENER PASTURES
ddd
ew IRS data and information are putting numbers behind a trend Conservatives have warned about for years: high-tax, Democrat-run states are hemorrhaging taxpayers to their Red, lower-tax rivals.
The figures which were drawn from Federal tax returns, show the 10 counties in the US with the largest net losses of taxpayers to other states were all in California or New York; reshaping state tax bases and local economies as families are pushed to chase lower taxes and cheaper living.
Los Angeles County topped the list, shedding a net 17,496 tax filers who carried nearly $1.9 billion in income out of state. Queens County, New York, followed at 17,109, then the Bronx at 16,319, Orange County, California, at 11,618, and Suffolk County, New York, with 10,434.
Manhattan was the lone exception for New York, drawing more new interstate taxpayers than any county in the country. However, the borough still lost nearly $1 billion in adjusted gross income overall; a sign newcomers are earning far less than those who left.
Heritage Foundation chief economist E.J. Antoni said the pattern reflects a simple truth about how Americans respond to heavy taxation.
“It’s very, very clear that people ultimately vote with their feet and when they feel like they’re getting taxed too much, they go somewhere else where they will be taxed less,” Antoni told Fox News Digital.
“If you look at where these people are going, they’re not going to Massachusetts or Illinois or California,” he said. “They’re going to Texas. They’re going to Tennessee. They’re going to Florida; places with low or no income taxes and low overall levels of taxation.”
Rounding out the top 10 losers: San Diego County, California, at 9,401; Nassau County, New York, at 9,130; Riverside County, California, at 8,968; San Bernardino County, California, at 8,462; and Kings County, New York, at 6,924.
Meanwhile, the biggest gainers of new residents were Maricopa County, Arizona, up 9,353; Harris County, Texas, up 8,955; King County, Washington, up 8,297; and Clark County, Nevada, up 7,524; largely low-tax jurisdictions drawing relocating families and businesses. ✪
▶️ WHY IT’S NO LONGER WOKE TO BE WOKE
WHY IT’S NO LONGER WOKE TO BE WOKE
kkk
ot so long ago, the acronym ESG was trendy in investment markets. The woke thing to do was to invest in ESG-friendly funds. Their popularity promised a maximum return on investment with a commitment to woke ideals. In a turnaround that surprised Wall Street, woke funds are no longer trendy. The savvy investors are staying away.
ESG stands for investing in corporations based on Environmental, Social and corporate-Governance factors. By adopting an ESG approach, mutual fund operators could deliver maximum return on investment while maintaining a minimal carbon footprint.
Investors could also virtue signal their support for LGBT and other social causes while making profits. Corporate structures could be made more inclusive despite threats such social engineering would affect productivity.
Best of all, ESG investment funds excluded all those things liberals love to hate: fossil fuels, weapons, tobacco, and alcohol stocks.
✪ Investors Are Bailing
Everything has now changed with ESG. In a turnaround which surprised Wall Street, woke funds are no longer trendy. In fact, savvy investors are staying away in droves. Call it something else, but money is avoiding the ESG tag at all costs.
The heyday of ESG investing was between 2018 and 2021, when the trend took hold. Hundreds of billions of dollars entered into this new market. At that time, the ESG juggernaut seemed impossible to stop. Wall Street giants like BlackRock and Vanguard put their weight behind the move. Investment capital and state pension funds poured into these ESG funds favoring leftist causes.
The Left also used these funds to promote shareholder activism. In the name of their (often unaware) investors, ESG mutual funds could use proxy voting to push through resolutions demanding greater climate disclosures, director diversity, and other woke matters. These votes often made headlines when they disrupted business operations with their leftist agendas.
✪ The Inevitable Backlash
In the spring of 2022, investors started getting the jitters when Conservatives denounced the woke agenda behind ESG guidelines, mandates, and proxy votes. Companies suffered egregious restraints and unrealistic ecological goals. Investors soon began to withdraw money and flee from these markets.
Not only did individuals react, but Red states which needed a good place to park their vast governmental pension funds also withdrew from ESG-related instruments. Conservatives responded to the Left’s weaponization of these funds by redirecting their tens of billions of dollars into more profitable and market-friendly alternatives.
As demand fell, the launch of new ESG mutual funds declined sharply. New fund launches declined from 116 in 2021 to a mere 9 in 2025. The firms also pulled back on the high-profile proxy voting which had caused so much concern and negative publicity.
Finally, people just left because of the disappointing returns. Leftist projects rarely make money unless they are about acquiring government money. Investing in woke causes may make someone feel good, but those involved often end up losing out on authentic money-making opportunities. The woke funds have underperformed because they excluded some of the largest and most profitable non-woke companies (such as oil companies) from their indexes and portfolios.
✪ Is The Era Of Woke Investment Over?
Thus, ESG has come to lose its way in the investment world. People are asking if ESG is dead. Indeed, a Wall Street Journal report titled “The State of ESG Investing: How Dire Is It?” asked that question.
Some fund managers say they still keep ESG alive by following the same guidelines but calling it by a different name. However, the ESG movement has lost too much momentum to ever recover. Giving defenders of the free market every reason to rejoice.
There are three lessons to be learned from the fall of woke investment:
First, leftist financial initiatives can be defeated even when supported by the most powerful Wall Street firms and liberal media. All it takes is the courage to say no. Never underestimate the power of protest, even when the odds seem great. Money always casts a strong vote.
Second, projects like these are really never about money; they are all about agenda and ideology. The backers of these initiatives target the economic system and seek to dismantle structures they deem contrary to the traditional ruling zeitgeist. They are willing to lose money (and encourage others to do the same) in order to see their egalitarian ideals triumph.
Finally, investors must be vigilant lest ESG mutants appear. Some defeated investment managers are doubling down on ESG — but without the name. They are engaged in the dishonest effort to repackage it with something that sounds better. Investors must be wary and insist upon no quarter being given to these subversive and deceptive funds.
✪ A Lack Of Originality
The Left has very few original ideas. It progresses little by little by disguising its dreadful ideals of complete equality and free license. Once exposed for what they are (socialist schemes), the public often rejects them.
When these radical projects suffer defeat, their activists must pull back and find a way to reinvent & recycle them.
That’s why Conservatives must always resist such trendy ideas. By forcing the Left back, its activists are then saddled with the arduous task of inventing new initiatives; and that take times and effort.
This is a victory in a battle but not the war. ESG has, for all practical purposes, been retired. If being woke means being trendy, activist investors will have to find another way to describe their leftist financial initiatives. Indeed, it is no longer woke to be woke anymore. ✪
▶️ ◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️ ✪✪✪ DONATE ✪✪✪ ◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️◼️
▶️ DONATE VIA PAYPAL (DEBIT & CREDIT CARD)
ALL PayPal Transactions Are Encrypted For Card Holder Privacy & Security
▶️ DONATE VIA ZELLE (DIRECT BANK CASH TRANSFER)
ZELLE is the perfect online alternative to PayPal. It’s an incredibly simple, secure, easy, fast and FREE way to send or receive money to recipients directly from your online banking account without a middleman. Best of all, there are NO fees.
ZELLE is a service provided by your bank and is already built in to your online banking account. You only need to activate it first before using. If you’ve already activated ZELLE in your online bank or credit union account, you can donate to The New Americanist by using our ZELLE address:
vip@thenewamericanist.com
To activate your ZELLE, follow these easy instructions (a simple two minute process):
▶️ DONATE VIA SNAIL MAIL
⭐️ 25 Minutes 43 Seconds
▶️ RSBN LIVESTREAM LINK: DHS Election Security Presser
⭐️ TokaiseBlessedPatriot
