✪ The Schumer Shutdown Begins

hhh

ortions of the Federal Government ground to a halt as of midnight this morning; and if you’re listening to the legacy media spin, you’d think the sky is falling. However, let’s cut through all the noise: this shutdown is squarely on the shoulders of Democrats in Congress who refused to play ball on a clean continuing resolution. They’ve dug in their heels, prioritizing their pet projects and radical agendas over keeping the lights on for non-essential services.

Forty-four Democrats voted Tuesday to block a House passed spending plan just hours before a long-anticipated funding deadline, sending the Federal Government careening toward a full shutdown for the first time since 2013. This full government shutdown officially began at 12:01 am EST.

President Trump and Republican leaders put forward a straightforward funding bill to extend government operations without all the customary pork and poison pills. It was a clean CR; no strings attached, just enough to keep things running while they hammer out a real budget. However, the Senate Democrats, led by the likes of Chuck Schumer, decided to block it, demanding billions more for their green energy boondoggles and Obamacare healthcare abominations. They felt confident in doing this because they know legacy media will prostitute excuses for them.

The gambit is sure to please, if only temporarily, the radical Democrat base clamoring for further resistance to President Donald Trump’s administration.

Shutting down the government isn’t necessarily a bad thing. The federal beast has grown so massive, with overlapping agencies & criminal waste of taxpayer dollars on everything from studying shrimp on treadmills to funding woke indoctrination programs in foreign countries. A shutdown forces a hard reset by separating the essential from the excessive. Essential services like Social Security payments, Medicare and national defense will keep rolling regardless of the shutdown because there are already laws which protect them. Exactly what is affected? The non-essentials: all the bureaucratic bloat & corruption which has been sucking up valuable resources without delivering any real value to Americans.

With very little incentive for Republicans to make any concessions to Democrats, no apparent path for Democrats to exit the shutdown exists; and their plan is widely predicted to backfire, causing long-term damage to Democrats.

Only three Democrats, Senators John Fetterman (PA), Catherine Cortez Masto (NV), and Angus King (I-ME), voted with a majority of Republicans for the bill, which failed 55 to 45, short of the 60 votes required. Republican Sen. Rand Paul (KY) voted against the bill. The same House passed bill also failed in the Senate just eleven days prior.

The House passed a clean continuing resolution (CR) September 19 to continue current spending levels until November 21. Those spending levels were originally passed during Joe Biden’s presidency and were extended through the end of the current fiscal year, September 30, 2025, in a CR in March.

The Democrat shutdown blocks a clean continuing resolution (CR) which would keep the government open for another seven weeks while further bipartisan negotiations on a more permanent budget could continue.

Those bipartisan negotiations would involve passing twelve smaller appropriations bills with new funding levels. In forcing a shutdown, the Democrats have forfeited their opportunity to extract more concessions from Republicans. However, the opportunity for those bipartisan negotiations have passed, perhaps terminally.

With Trump in the White House, those Biden era spending levels are apparently no longer satisfactory for Democrats; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), is now under fire from his base after initially opposing voting in favor of a March CR to continue the same funding levels now under debate.

House Democrats under Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) are complicit in supporting Schumer’s scheme. Only one voted along with House Republicans on the CR on September 19.

Republicans, who hold the White House, House of Representatives and the Senate, see little reason or incentive to give concessions to Democrats. They view the simple short-term funding bill as a temporary measure to finalize a longer-term package, through which larger funding questions can be addressed.

However, that hasn’t stopped Democrats frustrated by Trump’s ability to drive the national narrative from using the shutdown deadline in an attempt to shift the conversation over to healthcare:

Democrats, in messaging against the bill, are leaning heavily on health care, a rare issue they see as providing them an opportunity in the 2026 midterm elections. They’ve often used the term “Republican healthcare crisis” in arguing against the short-term spending bill, which includes no new provisions affecting healthcare.

Most notably, Democrats want to use the seven-week bill to extend Obamacare subsidies which don’t expire until the end of 2025. (Republicans argue a short-term bill is an inappropriate vehicle to attach such a consequential rider and such larger budgetary funding deserves its own thorough debate). Democrats are also advocating to use the short-term bill to undo provisions to protect Medicaid, including removing illegal aliens from welfare rolls, already passed back in July in Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill.

Finally, the Democrats want to fund the government by extending covid pandemic-era Obamacare subsidies which would cost taxpayers another $1.5 trillion, a non-starter for Republicans.

While the Democrat may succeed temporarily in forcing a conversation on healthcare, it’s unclear if any potential benefits from such a conversation outweigh the political risks.

In an attempt to get out ahead of the blame, the New York Times framed a poll question as whether or not Democrats should go forward and agree to a government shutdown.

The results of that poll are ominous with 65 percent of the respondents saying “no” to a government shutdown:

Democrats gambit to force a shutdown would temporarily please a radical base that has caused increasing personal political peril for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

With no clear exit path out of a shutdown which allows Democrats to secure any significant victories; and the shutdown gifting authority to the Trump White House to make widespread federal employee cuts, the long-term benefits for the Democrats are difficult to determine.

Any ways the Democrats can find out of this shutdown are likely to be extremely bumpy; and whatever road it takes them down only leads to an even more empowered and emboldened Trump White House.

In addition to receiving all the blame, the shutdown itself presents other political nightmares for Democrats to wrestle:

The Office of Management and Budget, led by Director Russ Vought, perhaps the most notorious opponent of the federal bureaucracy, issued a memo days before the funding deadline that said agencies should consider a “reduction in force” for many federal programs if the government closes; meaning thousands of federal workers could be permanently laid off.

Many of those shutdown layoffs of government bureaucrats, many of whom the Democrats see as their operatives within the Federal Government, would be permanent.

While the shutdown may be a complete disaster for Democrats, history shows these shutdowns often result better outcomes for Americans in general. After the 1995-1996 shutdown under President Clinton, we got welfare reform and a path to balanced budgets. The 2013 shutdown highlighted galvanized conservative resistance against Obamacare. This time, a shutdown could finally force Democrats to the table to cut wasteful spending and prioritize the needs of American families over their pet globalist giveaways. It’s a chance to send a strong message to Washington and remind them the government works for us, We The People.✪